Deep-time history of primate behavior and ecology as revealed by ancestral state reconstructions
Name
10914_2025_9756_ReferencePDF.pdf
Size
1.36 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
809f706aea8a9904cacc01735feeb1f2
Author(s) • • • • • • • • •
Spear, Jeffrey K.
Hoffman, Eva A.
Miyamae, Juri A.
Whalen, Christopher D.
Arre, Alyssa M.
Chen-Kraus, Chloe
Corley, Margaret K.
Fabbri, Matteo
Gauthier, Jacques A.
Hanson, Michael
Date Issued
May 24, 2025
Journal
Journal of Mammalian Evolution
Publisher
Springer US
Citation
Spear, J.K., Hoffman, E.A., Miyamae, J.A. et al. Deep-time history of primate behavior and ecology as revealed by ancestral state reconstructions. J Mammal Evol 32, 21 (2025).
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Primates exhibit many key behavioral traits that differentiate them from their mammalian relatives. The origin and evolution of these traits is a major focus of primate paleontology. Here, we perform a formal ancestral state reconstruction of extant primate species to generate hypotheses about when these behaviors originated in primate evolutionary history. We compiled a large dataset of primary source data on substrate use, activity pattern, group size and structure, mating system, natal dispersal, litter size, and diet for 196 extant species. We also include data on body size, sexual dimorphism, and encephalization quotient. We performed ancestral character estimation of continuous characters using a Bayesian model and discrete or binned characters using stochastic character mapping of a k-state Markov model (Mk model). We reconstruct the ancestral crown primates as highly arboreal, nocturnal, small bodied, small brained, and eating a diet predominantly of fruit and invertebrates with the possible addition of other plant foods such as leaves and flowers. Social systems are poorly estimated at deep nodes in the tree, but the best supported states involve small to medium-sized groups. Larger, more complex social groups evolve later and emerge alongside diurnality and larger body size. In general, reconstructions at key nodes are consistent with known fossils. Exceptions include ancestral strepsirrhines, which are not reconstructed as being similar to well-known adapoids, and the brain size of ancestral anthropoids, which is reconstructed as larger than most early anthropoid taxa.
MIT Department
MIT Open Learning
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-025-09756-5