Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy
  3. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Reports
  4. The Influence of Gas-to-Liquids and Natural Gas Production Technology Penetration on the Crude Oil-Natural Gas Price Relationship

The Influence of Gas-to-Liquids and Natural Gas Production Technology Penetration on the Crude Oil-Natural Gas Price Relationship

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MITJPSPGC_Rpt288.pdf

Size

949.94 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

402b5de6e7f5b66ab42f96d1920ab140

Author(s)
Ramberg, D.J.
•
Chen, Y.-H.H.
•
Paltsev, S.
•
Parsons, J.E.
Date Issued
December 2015
Publisher
MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
Citation
Report 288
Series/Report no.
MIT Joint Program Report Series;288
Abstract
The paper examines conditions under which gas-to-liquids (GTL) technology penetration shifts the crude oil-natural gas price ratio. Technologies that enable direct substitution across fuels, as GTL does, may constrain the price ratio within certain bounds. We analyze the forecasted evolution of the crude oil-natural gas price ratio over the next several decades under alternative assumptions about the availability and cost of GTL and its natural gas feedstock. We do this using a computable general equilibrium model of the global economy with a focus on the refinery sector in the U.S. Absent GTL, a base case forecast of global economic growth over the next few decades produces dramatic increases in the oil-natural gas price ratio. This is because there is a more limited supply of low-cost crude oil resources than natural gas resources. The availability of GTL at conventional forecasts of cost and efficiency does not materially change the picture because it is too expensive to enhance direct competition between the two as fuels in the transportation sector. GTL only modulates the increasing oil-gas price ratio if both (i) natural gas is much cheaper to produce, and (ii) GTL is less costly and more efficient than conventional forecasts.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102611
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.