Research Note on Footnote 24 of the 6th Circuit Hunter Decision
Name
wp_101.pdf
Size
143.48 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8ef8db38d54cf08539030c1f0c811ef5
Author(s)
Stewart III, Charles H.
Date Issued
February 3, 2011
Publisher
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
Series/Report no.
VTP Working Paper Series;101
Abstract
The decision issued by the three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Hunter v. Hamilton County Board of Elections contains a very interesting analysis of problems with Ohio’s law about counting provisional ballots when they are cast in “the right church, wrong pew” (RCWP).
Persistent DSpace Link