WMO Evaluation of Two Extreme High Temperatures Occurring in February 2020 for the Antarctic Peninsula Region
Name
1520-0477-BAMS-D-21-0040.1.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
6.65 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
5c73c0a91879ccde6c494ca38ebca0e3
Author(s)
Skansi, Maria de Los Milagros
Colwell, Steve
Bromwich, David H
Jones, Phil
King, John C
Lazzara, Matthew A
Renwick, James
Solomon, Susan
Brunet, Manola
Cerveny, Randall S
Date Issued
2021
Journal
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Citation
Skansi, Maria de Los Milagros, Colwell, Steve, Bromwich, David H, Jones, Phil, King, John C et al. 2021. "WMO Evaluation of Two Extreme High Temperatures Occurring in February 2020 for the Antarctic Peninsula Region." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 102 (11).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
ABSTRACTTwo reports of Antarctic region potential new record high temperature observations (18.3°C, 6 February 2020 at Esperanza station and 20.8°C, 9 February 2020 at a Brazilian automated permafrost monitoring station on Seymour Island) were evaluated by a World Meteorological Organization (WMO) panel of atmospheric scientists. The latter figure was reported as 20.75°C in the media. The panel considered the synoptic situation and instrumental setups. It determined that a large high pressure system over the area created föhn conditions and resulted in local warming for both situations. Examination of the data and metadata of the Esperanza station observation revealed no major concerns. However, analysis of data and metadata of the Seymour Island permafrost monitoring station indicated that an improvised radiation shield led to a demonstrable thermal bias error for the temperature sensor. Consequently, the WMO has accepted the 18.3°C value for 1200 LST 6 February 2020 (1500 UTC 6 February 2020) at the Argentine Esperanza station as the new “Antarctic region (continental, including mainland and surrounding islands) highest temperature recorded observation” but rejected the 20.8°C observation at the Brazilian automated Seymour Island permafrost monitoring station as biased. The committee strongly emphasizes the permafrost monitoring station was not badly designed for its purpose, but the project investigators were forced to improvise a nonoptimal radiation shield after losing the original covering. Second, with regard to media dissemination of this type of information, the committee urges increased caution in early announcements as many media outlets often tend to sensationalize and mischaracterize potential records.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0040.1
