Humans & humanists
Name
daed.2009.138.3.pdf
Size
119.82 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
35953f147c7cc86a8892862d3744ebba
Author(s)
Ritvo, Harriet
Date Issued
June 2009
Journal
Daedalus
Publisher
American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Citation
Ritvo, Harriet. “Humans & humanists.” Daedalus 138.3 (2009): 68-78. © 2009 by Harriet Ritvo.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
“When I use a word,” says Humpty Dumpty in Through the Looking Glass, “it means just what I choose it to mean– neither more nor less.” Alice demurs on several grounds, appealing first to contrary popular consensus–“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’”– and then to the essential limits of language: “The question is . . . whether you can make words mean so many different things.” Neither of Alice’s objections fazes Dumpty, who counter theorizes that “the question is . . . which is to be master,” then illustrates the practical benefits of his approach with a brilliant interpretation of “Jabberwocky,” a poem whose vocabulary Alice had previously found impenetrable.1 There is, of course, much to be said on both sides of this debate. Many people have, like Dumpty, recognized the power of vocabulary and made similar attempts to control definitional borders. If, again like Dumpty, they have neglected to acknowledge the alternative viewpoints represented by Alice and her ilk, they have usually found this easier said than done.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2009.138.3.68
