Farming for supermarkets : its collective good problems and what Brazilian growers have done about them
Name
60248719-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
11.43 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e3c41a45eb21c27320fac508fe49872f
Author(s)
Gomes, Raquel Silva
Advisor(s)
Judith Tendler.
Date Issued
2004
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
This dissertation analyzes the conditions under which growers have effectively resolved collective good problems associated with the rise of supermarkets. It answers two questions: What institutional arrangements have growers used to resolve collective problems and what explains the differences in these arrangements in terms of what they achieve and whom they benefit. Brazilian fresh fruit growers have turned to a variety of institutional arrangements in resolving collective good problems, including growers's associations, cooperatives, trade groups; closer ties with public sector agricultural research and extension agencies; and closer ties with their buyers and input suppliers. Economic incentives and constraints are at the basis of which strategy growers pursue and its effectiveness. Yet findings suggest that growers' responsiveness to the rise of supermarkets are also a function of incentives and constraints embedded in 1) the form of government support in the 1970s and 1980s which led to varying structures of production and government-grower relations that still predominate today, 2) crop characteristics that affect how growers organize, where more complex crops (costlier, riskier) are associated with greater collaborative efforts, and 3) Japanese-Brazilian ethnic ties that have facilitated the resolution of collective good problems among groups of medium growers. Interpreting the recent development of fruit production across these cases as a reflection of these locally-embedded factors suggests that developing country governments often have greater margin for action than that which is often portrayed.
Description
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 145-155).
Subjects
Urban Studies and Planning.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Persistent DSpace Link
