Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Libraries
  3. MIT Theses
  4. Graduate Theses
  5. Optical In-Process Monitoring Tools for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Verifying Powder Area Coverage of a Layer Setup

Optical In-Process Monitoring Tools for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Verifying Powder Area Coverage of a Layer Setup

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

modes-jmodes-mng-2023-thesis-HOLD.pdf

Description
Thesis PDF
Size

3.83 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

c5556a10faf0cd12ea4fe54aeccbcb4a

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Disclaimer Sheet-Date.pdf

Description
Supplementary file
Size

229.2 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

e6a0ab8d12b274c36ee147b8047d944e

Author(s)
Modes, Jane Ellen
Advisor(s)
Hardt, David E.
Date Issued
February 2023
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) allows for the creation of complex geometries that cannot be created with traditional manufacturing methods and is widely used in many industries. With any additive manufacturing process, achieving a successful Flayer is critical to the quality of the final part. Currently, no machine can provide objective evidence of a proper layer setup with in-process monitoring equipment. The strategy of this project was to utilize various sensors in tandem with the camera available within the machine to distinguish between passing and failing layers in a quantifiable manner. This thesis aimed to test the 3D printer’s on-machine camera and several other off the shelf cameras, (Spectral Instruments RVT100, GoPro HERO7 Black, STPCTOU Wireless Digital Microscope, and iPhone 12 camera,), to determine which if any of them were suitable for quantifying a layer setup through powder area coverage. Several tests were performed to look at the camera repeatability across one or several locations by analyzing image intensity values in ImageJ. Another test was performed to determine if there was a linear correlation between layer thickness and image intensity. The cumulative results from all tests indicate that the on-machine camera is the best option of all cameras tested for this application.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Copyright retained by author(s)
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152122
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.