Lunar floor-fractured craters: Classification, distribution, origin and implications for magmatism and shallow crustal structure
Name
Zuber_Lunar floor.pdf
Size
4.29 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
4d9c159091f1e6eb4b60006e7da5dc76
Author(s)
Jozwiak, Lauren M.
Head, James W.
Neumann, Gregory A.
Zuber, Maria
Smith, David Edmund
Date Issued
November 2012
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Citation
Jozwiak, Lauren M., James W. Head, Maria T. Zuber, David E. Smith, and Gregory A. Neumann. “Lunar Floor-Fractured Craters: Classification, Distribution, Origin and Implications for Magmatism and Shallow Crustal Structure.” Journal of Geophysical Research 117, no. E11 (2012). Copyright © 2012 American Geophysical Union
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Floor-Fractured Craters (FFCs) are a class of lunar craters characterized by anomalously shallow floors cut by radial, concentric, and/or polygonal fractures; additional interior features are moats, ridges, and patches of mare material. Two formation mechanisms have been hypothesized—floor uplift in response to shallow magmatic intrusion and sill formation, and floor shallowing in response to thermally driven viscous relaxation. This study combines new Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) data to characterize and categorize the population of FFCs and map their distribution on the Moon, and uses variations in floor-fractured crater morphology and regional distribution to investigate the proposed formation mechanisms. The population of FFCs was categorized according to the classes outlined by Schultz (1976). The distribution of these FFC categories shows an evolution of crater morphology from areas adjacent to lunar impact basins to areas in the lunar highlands. We propose that this trend is supportive of formation by shallow magmatic intrusion and sill formation—crustal thickness determines the magnitude of magmatic driving pressure, and thus either piston-like floor uplift for high magnitude, or a convex floor profile for low magnitude. Predictions from previous studies modeling viscous relaxation are inconsistent with the observed altimetric profiles of FFCs. Hence our analysis favors FFC formation by shallow magmatic intrusion, with the variety of FFC morphologies being intimately linked with location and crustal thickness, and the driving pressure of the intrusion. Data from the GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) mission will help to test these conclusions.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012je004134
