Algorithmic discrimination in the credit domain: what do we know about it?
Name
146_2023_Article_1676.pdf
Size
2.14 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
2f95b2cdcb2ee925d3ce8d0a69a0c312
Author(s)
Garcia, Ana C. B.
Garcia, Marcio G. P.
Rigobon, Roberto
Date Issued
May 17, 2023
Publisher
Springer London
Citation
Garcia, Ana C. B., Garcia, Marcio G. P. and Rigobon, Roberto. 2023. "Algorithmic discrimination in the credit domain: what do we know about it?."
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Abstract
The widespread usage of machine learning systems and econometric methods in the credit domain has transformed the decision-making process for evaluating loan applications. Automated analysis of credit applications diminishes the subjectivity of the decision-making process. On the other hand, since machine learning is based on past decisions recorded in the financial institutions’ datasets, the process very often consolidates existing bias and prejudice against groups defined by race, sex, sexual orientation, and other attributes. Therefore, the interest in identifying, preventing, and mitigating algorithmic discrimination has grown exponentially in many areas, such as Computer Science, Economics, Law, and Social Science. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review to understand (1) the research settings, including the discrimination theory foundation, the legal framework, and the applicable fairness metric; (2) the addressed issues and solutions; and (3) the open challenges for potential future research. We explored five sources: ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, IEEE Digital Library, Springer Link, and Scopus. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 78 papers written in English and published between 2017 and 2022. According to the meta-analysis of this literature survey, algorithmic discrimination has been addressed mainly by looking at the CS, Law, and Economics perspectives. There has been great interest in this topic in the financial area, especially the discrimination in providing access to the mortgage market and differential treatment (different fees, number of parcels, and interest rates). Most attention has been devoted to the potential discrimination due to bias in the dataset. Researchers are still only dealing with direct discrimination, addressed by algorithmic fairness, while indirect discrimination (structural discrimination) has not received the same attention.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01676-3
