Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. On the causality paradox and the Karch-Randall braneworld as an EFT

On the causality paradox and the Karch-Randall braneworld as an EFT

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

13130_2023_Article_22049.pdf

Size

1.07 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

88cbb4b79a5590f28e7432f9f141e586

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_6507648965424658016.zip (907.24 KB)
Author(s)
Neuenfeld, Dominik
•
Srivastava, Manu
Date Issued
October 26, 2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Citation
Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023 Oct 26;2023(10):164
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Abstract Holography on cutoff surfaces can appear to be in tension with causality. For example, as argued by Omiya and Wei [1], double holography seemingly allows for superluminal signalling. In this paper we argue that the brane description of double holography should be treated as an effective theory and demonstrate that causality violations due to faster-than-light communication are not visible above the associated cutoff length scale. This suggests that end-of-the-world brane models are consistent with causality and that the apparent superluminal signalling is a UV effect. Moreover, we argue that short distance non-localities generically give rise to apparent faster-than-light propagation of signals in Anti-de Sitter space. Nonetheless, superluminal signalling indicates that the causal structure on holographic cutoff surfaces needs to be modified. We propose and study three different candidate regions that might replace the domain of dependence in the brane EFT of the Karch-Randall model. These regions are defined by unitarity on the brane, through bulk entanglement wedges and through the nice slice criterion, respectively. In all dimensions, these candidate regions exclude those parts of the domain of dependence which are affected by superluminal signalling. While all three definitions agree in two dimensions, they are different in higher dimensions.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Theoretical Physics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152550
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2023)164
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.