Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste
Name
d3ee00749a.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
4.56 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
4a330a436b101382fcb85f16c8e2c7fc
Author(s)
Yadav, Geetanjali
Singh, Avantika
Dutta, Abhijit
Uekert, Taylor
DesVeaux, Jason S
Nicholson, Scott R
Tan, Eric CD
Mukarakate, Calvin
Schaidle, Joshua A
Wrasman, Cody J
Date Issued
June 5, 2023
Journal
Energy & Environmental Science
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry
Citation
Yadav, Geetanjali, Singh, Avantika, Dutta, Abhijit, Uekert, Taylor, DesVeaux, Jason S et al. 2023. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste." Energy & Environmental Science, 16 (9).
Version
Final published version
Abstract
yrolysis of waste plastics has gained interest as a candidate chemical recycling technology. To examine the potential of this approach, we conducted a techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of a conceptual catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) facility that converts 240 metric tons/day of mixed plastic waste. The modeled base case predicts the minimum selling price (MSP) of a benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTX) mixture at $1.07 per kg when co-products are sold at their average market prices. We predict that the aromatic product stream can be cost-competitive with virgin BTX mixtures ($0.68/kg) if the mixed waste plastics are available for less than $0.10/kg or if crude oil prices exceed $60/barrel. Moreover, we estimate that CFP-based conversion of waste plastics can reduce the total supply chain energy use by 24% but with a 2.4-fold increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per kilogram of BTX, relative to incumbent manufacturing process. Sensitivity analysis highlights that feedstock cost, co-product selling prices, capital cost for product separations, and operating costs are key cost drivers. Further, we examine three additional CFP processes that differ in product composition, namely naphtha, and a case where the products are rich in either C2–C4 olefins or BTX aromatic hydrocarbons. Whereas the MSP of naphtha ($2.18/kg) is ∼4-fold higher than virgin naphtha, both the olefin-rich and aromatics-rich product cases exhibit a potential reduction in MSP up to 40%, with a 21%–45% reduction in total supply chain energy and 2.2–3.8-fold increase in GHG emissions relative to incumbent manufacturing processes. LCA predicts that the CFP process exhibits lower fossil fuel depletion than virgin manufacturing across all cases as well as lower acidification, ozone depletion, and smog formation for select cases, but high utility and feedstock preparation requirements result in poorer performance across other metrics. Overall, this study highlights important process parameters for improving CFP of mixed waste plastics from economic and environmental perspectives.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ee00749a
