Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. On the present and future economic viability of stand-alone pressure-retarded osmosis

On the present and future economic viability of stand-alone pressure-retarded osmosis

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

CHUNG-PRO_Economics-Desalination-2017-preprint.pdf

Size

10.34 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

00b95742f4290dd6459d27fb918a34fe

Author(s)
Chung, Hyung Won
•
Banchik, Leonardo David
•
Swaminathan, Jaichander
•
Lienhard, John H
Date Issued
January 2017
Journal
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Citation
Chung, Hyung Won, Leonardo D. Banchik, Jaichander Swaminathan, and John H. Lienhard V. “On the Present and Future Economic Viability of Stand-Alone Pressure-Retarded Osmosis.” Desalination 408 (April 2017): 133–144.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Pressure-retarded osmosis is a renewable method of power production from salinity gradients which has generated significant academic and commercial interest but, to date, has not been successfully implemented on a large scale. In this work, we investigate lower bound cost scenarios for power generation with PRO to evaluate its economic viability. We build a comprehensive economic model for PRO with assumptions that minimize the cost of power production, thereby conclusively identifying the operating conditions that are not economically viable. With the current state-of-the art PRO membranes, we estimate the minimum levelized cost of electricity for PRO of US$1.2/kWh for seawater and river water pairing, $0.44/kWh for reverse osmosis brine and wastewater, and $0.066/kWh for nearly saturated water (26% wt) and river water, all for a 2 MW production system. Only a pairing of extremely high salinity (greater than 18%) water and freshwater has the potential to compete with wind power currently at $0.074/kWh. We show two methods for reducing this cost via economies of scale and reducing the membrane structural parameter. We find that the latter method reduces the levelized cost of electricity significantly more than increasing the membrane permeability coefficient.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Rohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107716
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.001
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.