Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. The Strategic Implications of Scale in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

The Strategic Implications of Scale in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

mksc.2019.1178.pdf

Size

1.26 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a08f47aae1f09b7f7a035352b69f5d0a

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Hauser_Eggers_Selove COMBINED Strategic Scale June 2018.pdf

Size

2.01 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

69adf24aeb864181521683393b1bd2f2

Author(s)
Hauser, John R
•
Eggers, Felix
•
Selove, Matthew
Date Issued
November 2019
Journal
Marketing Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Citation
Hauser, John R. et al. "The Strategic Implications of Scale in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis." Marketing Science 38, 6 (November 2019): 913-1084 © 2019 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Choice-based conjoint (CBC) studies have begun to rely on simulators to forecast equilibrium prices for pricing, strategic product positioning, and patent/copyright valuations. Whereas CBC research has long focused on the accuracy of estimated relative partworths of attribute levels, predicted equilibrium prices and strategic positioning are surprisingly and dramatically dependent on scale: the magnitude of the partworths (including the price coefficient) relative to the magnitude of the error term. Although the impact of scale on the ability to estimate heterogeneous partworths is well known, neither the literature nor current practice address the sensitivity of pricing and positioning to scale. This sensitivity is important because (estimated) scale depends on seemingly innocuous market-research decisions such as whether attributes are described by text or by realistic images. We demonstrate the strategic implications of scale using a stylized model in which heterogeneity is modeled explicitly. If a firm shirks on the quality of a CBC study and acts on incorrectly observed scale, a follower, but not an innovator, can make costly strategic errors. Externally valid estimates of scale are extremely important. We demonstrate empirically that image realism and incentive alignment affect scale sufficiently to change strategic decisions and affect patent/copyright valuations by hundreds of millions of dollars.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124213
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1178
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.