Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media
Name
13799.full.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
2.26 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
373b41f2c285392537a36e21301a4aa8
Author(s)
Primkulov, Bauyrzhan K.
Date Issued
June 21, 2019
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Citation
Zhao, Benzhong et al. "Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (2019): 13799-13806 © 2019 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.
Subjects
Multidisciplinary
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116