Independent Finite Approximations for Bayesian Nonparametric Inference
Name
Download (11).pdf
Description
Published version
Size
972.44 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
7e7af9955ca6a819292b95c85bca761b
Author(s) • • • •
Nguyen, Tin D
Huggins, Jonathan
Masoero, Lorenzo
Mackey, Lester
Broderick, Tamara
Date Issued
December 2024
Journal
Bayesian Analysis
Publisher
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Citation
Tin D. Nguyen. Jonathan Huggins. Lorenzo Masoero. Lester Mackey. Tamara Broderick. "Independent Finite Approximations for Bayesian Nonparametric Inference." Bayesian Anal. 19 (4) 1187 - 1224, December 2024.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Completely random measures (CRMs) and their normalizations (NCRMs) offer flexible models in Bayesian nonparametrics. But their infinite dimensionality presents challenges for inference. Two popular finite approximations are truncated finite approximations (TFAs) and independent finite approximations (IFAs). While the former have been well-studied, IFAs lack similarly general bounds on approximation error, and there has been no systematic comparison between the two options. In the present work, we propose a general recipe to construct practical finite-dimensional approximations for homogeneous CRMs and NCRMs, in the presence or absence of power laws. We call our construction the automated independent finite approximation (AIFA). Relative to TFAs, we show that AIFAs facilitate more straightforward derivations and use of parallel computing in approximate inference. We upper bound the approximation error of AIFAs for a wide class of common CRMs and NCRMs — and thereby develop guidelines for choosing the approximation level. Our lower bounds in key cases suggest that our upper bounds are tight. We prove that, for worst-case choices of observation likelihoods, TFAs are more efficient than AIFAs. Conversely, we find that in real-data experiments with standard likelihoods, AIFAs and TFAs perform similarly. Moreover, we demonstrate that AIFAs can be used for hyperparameter estimation even when other potential IFA options struggle or do not apply.
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1214/23-BA1385