Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension

STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

2020.acl-main.507.pdf

Description
Published version
Size

199.63 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

d5f8eaabd25f1c6661e43507414570a5

sword-2021-12-01T17:42:13.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Berzak, Yevgeni
•
Malmaud, Jonathan
•
Levy, Roger
Date Issued
2020
Journal
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
Citation
Berzak, Yevgeni, Malmaud, Jonathan and Levy, Roger. 2020. "STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension." Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We present STARC (Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehension), a new annotation framework for assessing reading comprehension with multiple choice questions. Our framework introduces a principled structure for the answer choices and ties them to textual span annotations. The framework is implemented in OneStopQA, a new high-quality dataset for evaluation and analysis of reading comprehension in English. We use this dataset to demonstrate that STARC can be leveraged for a key new application for the development of SAT-like reading comprehension materials: automatic annotation quality probing via span ablation experiments. We further show that it enables in-depth analyses and comparisons between machine and human reading comprehension behavior, including error distributions and guessing ability. Our experiments also reveal that the standard multiple choice dataset in NLP, RACE (Lai et al., 2017), is limited in its ability to measure reading comprehension. 47% of its questions can be guessed by machines without accessing the passage, and 18% are unanimously judged by humans as not having a unique correct answer. OneStopQA provides an alternative test set for reading comprehension which alleviates these shortcomings and has a substantially higher human ceiling performance.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138279
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2020.ACL-MAIN.507
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.