Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese

Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

6-2687-1-PB.pdf

Size

780.41 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6726dfb96307461752736de2066019ad

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2017-10-23.original.zip (518.87 KB)
Author(s)
Miyagawa, Shigeru
•
Nishioka, Nobuaki
•
Zeijlstra, Hedde
Date Issued
September 2016
Journal
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
Publisher
Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
Citation
Miyagawa, Shigeru, et al. “Negative Sensitive Items and the Discourse-Configurational Nature of Japanese.” Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 1, 1 (September 2016): 33 © 2016 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We take up three Negative Sensitive Items (NSIs) in Japanese, Wh-MO plain negative indefinites, exceptive XP-sika, and certain minimizing indefinites, such as rokuna N (‘any decent N’). Although these three NSIs behave differently, we demonstrate that the two traditional NSI categories of Negative Concord Items (NCIs) and Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) are sufficient for characterizing these items. We argue that Wh-MO and XP-sika are NCIs, thus they contain a neg feature ([uneg]) which enters into (upward) agreement with its corresponding an uninterpretable feature ([ineg]). The third NSI, rokuna N, is an NPI. Two issues arise with XP-sika. First, it has an inherent focus feature, which distinguishes it from the other two. Second, this focus feature is syntactically active – meaning that movement is forced – only for the argument XP-sika. We argue that these properties of XP-sika associated with focus are independent of NP-sika as an NSI, and should be dealt with as an overall property of Japanese being a discourse configurational language. We introduce a case-theoretic solution to how focus becomes syntactically active solely with argument XP-sika.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111966
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.5334/GJGL.6
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.