Modality and Time in Logical Context
Name
staniszewski-fjs-phd-24-2022-thesis.pdf
Description
Thesis PDF
Size
4.54 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
16d6d583d74d3a7901dd3c988e6012f0
Author(s)
Staniszewski, Frank
Advisor(s)
Aravind, Athulya
von Fintel, Kai
Fox, Danny
Iatridou, Sabine
Date Issued
September 2022
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
This thesis argues for a theory of neg-raising that is unified with existing theories of free choice (Fox, 2007; Bar-Lev, 2018) and negative polarity items (Crnič, 2014b, 2019b), as motivated by a case study of polarity-sensitive 'until'. I argue that this unification of neg-raising and polarity-sensitivity falls out as a natural consequence of the systems developed in this earlier work, combined with the novel assumption that the neg-raising predicates 'want', 'should', and 'supposed to' express underlying existential quantificational force, which is disguised on the surface as the result of obligatory strengthening in positive sentences due to the lack of a dual in the lexicon.
The primary empirical motivation for this view comes from a novel test that is able to diagnose the underlying existential meaning of the modal items. The test requires a negative presupposition trigger, like 'no longer', which creates a downward-entailing environment in which strengthening need not apply, but which also triggers an upward-entailing presupposition, in which the basic existential meaning can be revealed. I argue that further results of this test suggest a typology of neg-raising modals that is predicted by the analysis. I also present a study (joint work with Rachel Stacy and Athulya Aravind), in which we examine predictions of the analysis in the domain of language acquisition. We argue that the proposal receives support from experimental evidence suggesting that a population of children go through a stage of development in which all modals undergo strengthening in a similar manner to the neg-raising modals examined in this thesis.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
Copyright MIT
Persistent DSpace Link