Cleaning a dark matter detector: A case of ontological and normative elusiveness
Name
de-swart-mol-2025-cleaning-a-dark-matter-detector-a-case-of-ontological-and-normative-elusiveness.pdf
Size
1.71 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8a349e55fef259eaba9823266857c070
Author(s)
de Swart, Jaco
Mol, Annemarie
Date Issued
August 30, 2025
Journal
Social Studies of Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Citation
de Swart, J., & Mol, A. (2026). Cleaning a dark matter detector: A case of ontological and normative elusiveness. Social Studies of Science, 56(1), 3-27.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Laboratory sciences crucially depend on the cleanliness of experiments. But what is clean? In this article, we show that the salience of the valuation clean emerges through its relation to a particular ontological repertoire. Our case is the XENONnT experiment in the Gran Sasso Mountains of Italy, designed to detect dark matter in the form of hypothetical WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles). In this experiment, dirt presents a significant disruption, as contaminations can mimic the signals of WIMPs, and electronegative molecules risk erasing such signals. The ideosyncratic cleanliness required makes the practice of cleaning the XENONnT detector exceedingly difficult. So far, the ontological question ‘do WIMPs exist?’ remains open, which means that the normative question ‘is the detector clean enough?’ cannot be answered either. In addition, more cleaning will make the detector sensitive to a background of unremovable neutrinos—hence irredeemably dirty. With the normative goal of a ‘clean detector’ out of reach, the ontological question ‘do WIMPs exist?’ is bound to remain open as well. Alternative experiments therefore hunt for different hypothetical dark matter candidates, with different equipment, requiring different kinds of cleanliness. At the same time, the XENONnT experiment must navigate tensions between its own cleanliness goals and rules meant to ensure the environmental cleanliness of the Gran Sasso National Park. Cleaning turns out to be dirty. This leads us to ask: Which goods deserve to be cherished, and, intertwined with that, which realities deserve to be cared for?
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251361158
