Beyond the Counter: A Systemic Mapping of Nanostore Identities in Traditional, Informal Retail Through Multi-Dimensional Archetypes
Name
systems-13-00546.pdf
Size
1019.5 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
7c559623e7fa8d363a6d52488852d46b
Author(s)
Salinas-Navarro, David Ernesto
Vilalta-Perdomo, Eliseo
Mejía-Argueta, Christopher
Date Issued
July 5, 2025
Journal
Systems
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citation
Salinas-Navarro, D.E.; Vilalta-Perdomo, E.; Mejía-Argueta, C. Beyond the Counter: A Systemic Mapping of Nanostore Identities in Traditional, Informal Retail Through Multi-Dimensional Archetypes. Systems 2025, 13, 546.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
This study examines the identity of nanostores—micro, independent grocery retailers—through a systemic, stakeholder-informed lens to promote their survivability and competitiveness. Moving beyond traditional operational descriptions, it introduces a multidimensional framework that examines what nanostores do (X), how they do it (Y), and why they matter (Z), which is complemented by the use of the TASCOI tool to produce identity statements. Based on survey data collection and a thematic analysis of nanostore stakeholder responses in Mexico City, the research categorises identity statements into six 2 × 2 matrices across four dimensions: operational, functional, relational, and adaptive. This analysis yields twenty-four archetypes that capture the diversity, complexity, and adaptability of nanostores. The findings reveal that nanostores are not a homogeneous category. They simultaneously exhibit characteristics of multiple archetypes, blending retail function, social embeddedness, and entrepreneurial adaptation. This study contributes to the nanostore and micro-enterprise literature by operationalising identity description and offers practical insights for supporting diverse shop types through context-sensitive policy and business strategies. While this study ensures internal validity and reliability through systematic coding and stakeholder feedback, it acknowledges limitations in its generalisability. Future research may build on this work through comparative studies, longitudinal tracking, and direct engagement with nanostore owners and their communities to further understand the dynamics of their identity and their resilience in evolving retail landscapes.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logistics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070546
