Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Trade at the margin: Estimating the economic implications of preferential trade agreements

Trade at the margin: Estimating the economic implications of preferential trade agreements

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

11558_2018_Article_9306.pdf

Size

1.61 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

1b6f3e8051767165003d67b00c2484b5

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
art_3964359484567566996.zip (1.24 MB)
Author(s)
Spilker, Gabriele
•
Bernauer, Thomas
•
Kim, In Song
•
Milner, Helen
•
Osgood, Iain
•
Tingley, Dustin
Date Issued
April 2018
Journal
The Review of International Organizations
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Citation
Spilker, Gabriele et al. “Trade at the Margin: Estimating the Economic Implications of Preferential Trade Agreements.” The Review of International Organizations (April 2018): 1-54 © 2018 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) have become the most prevalent form of international trade liberalization in recent decades, even though it remains far from clear what their effects on economies and their key units, firms, are. This paper evaluates the distributional consequences of trade liberalization within industries differentiating two distinct aspects in which trade liberalization could result in higher trade flows: the intensive vs. the extensive margin of trade. In particular, we analyze whether trade liberalization leads to increased trade flows because either firms trade more volume in products they have already traded before (intensive margin) or because they start to trade products they have not traded previously (extensive margin), or both. We test these arguments for the Dominican Republic–Central America–United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and exporting firms based in Costa Rica for the time-period 2008–2014. The results of our study suggest that the effects of CAFTA-DR depend not only on whether we analyze the extensive versus the intensive margin of trade but also whether the product in question is homogenous or differentiated and whether the exporting firm under analysis is small or large. In particular, we find support for the theoretical expectation that firms exporting heterogeneous products, such as textiles, gain from trade agreements, such as CAFTA-DR, in that they can export more varieties of their products. Yet at the same time, they tend to lose at the intensive margin by a reduction in their trade volume while the opposite pattern occurs for firms exporting homogenous products. Keywords: Preferential trade agreements; Product differentiation; Extensive margin of trade; Intensive margin of trade
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114654
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9306-7
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.