Molecular hallmarks of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal resilience to Alzheimer’s disease
Name
13024_2025_Article_892.pdf
Size
6.5 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
4e506df68417599dc91783a57964a5d8
Author(s) • • • • • • • •
Castanho, Isabel
Naderi Yeganeh, Pourya
Boix, Carles A.
Morgan, Sarah L.
Mathys, Hansruedi
Prokopenko, Dmitry
White, Bartholomew
Soto, Larisa M.
Pegoraro, Giulia
Date Issued
October 1, 2025
Journal
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Publisher
BioMed Central
Citation
Castanho, I., Naderi Yeganeh, P., Boix, C.A. et al. Molecular hallmarks of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal resilience to Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegeneration 20, 103
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Background A significant proportion of individuals maintain cognition despite extensive Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, known as cognitive resilience. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that protect these individuals could reveal therapeutic targets for AD. Methods This study defines molecular and cellular signatures of cognitive resilience by integrating bulk RNA and single-cell transcriptomic data with genetics across multiple brain regions. We analyzed data from the Religious Order Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), including bulk RNA sequencing (n = 631 individuals) and multiregional single-nucleus RNA sequencing (n = 48 individuals). Subjects were categorized into AD, resilient, and control based on β-amyloid and tau pathology, and cognitive status. We identified and prioritized protected cell populations using whole-genome sequencing-derived genetic variants, transcriptomic profiling, and cellular composition. Results Transcriptomics and polygenic risk analysis position resilience as an intermediate AD state. Only GFAP and KLF4 expression distinguished resilience from controls at tissue level, whereas differential expression of genes involved in nucleic acid metabolism and signaling differentiated AD and resilient brains. At the cellular level, resilience was characterized by broad downregulation of LINGO1 expression and reorganization of chaperone pathways, specifically downregulation of Hsp90 and upregulation of Hsp40, Hsp70, and Hsp110 families in excitatory neurons. MEF2C, ATP8B1, and RELN emerged as key markers of resilient neurons. Excitatory neuronal subtypes in the entorhinal cortex (ATP8B+ and MEF2Chigh) exhibited unique resilience signaling through activation of neurotrophin (BDNF-NTRK2, modulated by LINGO1) and angiopoietin (ANGPT2-TEK) pathways. MEF2C+ inhibitory neurons were over-represented in resilient brains, and the expression of genes associated with rare genetic variants revealed vulnerable somatostatin (SST) cortical interneurons that survive in AD resilience. The maintenance of excitatory-inhibitory balance emerges as a key characteristic of resilience. Conclusions We have defined molecular and cellular hallmarks of cognitive resilience, an intermediate state in the AD continuum. Resilience mechanisms include preserved neuronal function, balanced network activity, and activation of neurotrophic survival signaling. Specific excitatory neuronal populations appear to play a central role in mediating cognitive resilience, while a subset of vulnerable interneurons likely provides compensation against AD-associated hyperexcitability. This study offers a framework to leverage natural protective mechanisms to mitigate neurodegeneration and preserve cognition in AD.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-025-00892-3