Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Towards definition of an ECM parts list: An advance on GO categories

Towards definition of an ECM parts list: An advance on GO categories

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Towards Definition of an ECM Parts List_Dspace.pdf

Size

173.17 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

2d3bbdc67f52efcd316892841d1ea536

Author(s)
Naba, Alexandra
•
Hoersch, Sebastian
•
Hynes, Richard O.
•
Hynes, Richard O.
Date Issued
September 2012
Journal
Matrix Biology
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Citation
Naba, Alexandra, Sebastian Hoersch, and Richard O. Hynes. “Towards Definition of an ECM Parts List: An Advance on GO Categories.” Matrix Biology 31, no. 7-8 (September 2012): 371–372.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Those of us interested in the extracellular matrix (ECM) are faced with significant challenges of definition. ECM proteins are large, complex and assembled into crosslinked insoluble matrices. This has meant that defining the biochemical composition of ECMs has been difficult. Nonetheless, protein chemistry and molecular biology have defined many familiar ECM proteins — collagens, proteoglycans, laminins, thrombospondins, tenascins, fibronectins, etc. With the completion of many genomes it should now be possible to develop complete “parts lists” for the ECM. Such lists are needed for analyzing data from “omic” approaches such as expression arrays, latest-generation sequencing and proteomics. These approaches generate long lists and it is typically necessary to extract from those lists the genes/proteins of interest. Anyone who attempts to do this using the commonly used gene ontology (GO) categories soon discovers that they are largely useless for defining ECM proteins. Many ECM proteins are unannotated and those which are, are sorted, with little evidence of logic or consistency, into diverse categories such “extracellular matrix,” “basement membrane,” “cell surface” and many others. The human and mouse orthologs are often found in different categories and attempts to use GO categories to extract a complete list of ECM genes or proteins from a data set are unsatisfactory at best.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106801
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2012.11.008
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.