How Lasting is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy
Name
Hainmueller_How Lasting.pdf
Size
2.55 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
4bc11880e813deb6120cb7ff17356fe6
Author(s)
Bechtel, Michael M.
Hainmueller, Jens
Date Issued
July 2011
Journal
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Pubishers
Citation
Bechtel, Michael M., and Jens Hainmueller. “How Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 55.4 (2011): 852–868. Web.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Dominant theories of electoral behavior emphasize that voters myopically evaluate policy performance and that this shortsightedness may obstruct the welfare-improving effect of democratic accountability. However, we know little about how long governments receive electoral credit for beneficial policies. We exploit the massive policy response to a major natural disaster, the 2002 Elbe flooding in Germany, to provide an upper bound for the short- and long-term electoral returns to targeted policy benefits. We estimate that the flood response increased vote shares for the incumbent party by 7 percentage points in affected areas in the 2002 election. Twenty-five percent of this short-term reward carried over to the 2005 election before the gains vanished in the 2009 election. We conclude that, given favorable circumstances, policy makers can generate voter gratitude that persists longer than scholarship has acknowledged so far, and elaborate on the implications for theories of electoral behavior, democratic accountability, and public policy.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00533.x
