Can the Biomedical Research Cycle be a Model for Political Science?
Name
Can the biomedical research.pdf
Size
1.27 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f3b280f0e69eed0e8a31d0e33fdbe957
Author(s)
Lieberman, Evan S
Date Issued
December 2016
Journal
Perspectives on Politics
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Citation
Lieberman, Evan S. “Can the Biomedical Research Cycle Be a Model for Political Science?” Perspectives on Politics 14, 4 (December 2016): 1054–1066 © 2016 American Political Science Association
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
In sciences such as biomedicine, researchers and journal editors are well aware that progress in answering difficult questions generally requires movement through a research cycle: Research on a topic or problem progresses from pure description, through correlational analyses and natural experiments, to phased randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In biomedical research all of these research activities are valued and find publication outlets in major journals. In political science, however, a growing emphasis on valid causal inference has led to the suppression of work early in the research cycle. The result of a potentially myopic emphasis on just one aspect of the cycle reduces incentives for discovery of new types of political phenomena, and more careful, efficient, transparent, and ethical research practices. Political science should recognize the significance of the research cycle and develop distinct criteria to evaluate work at each of its stages.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271600298X
