Picture Detection in RSVP: Features or Identity?
Name
Potter-Picture detection.pdf
Size
679.55 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
5d00dd04403229f6e6be9ea70028e3f3
Author(s) • • •
Potter, Mary C.
Wyble, Brad
Pandav, Rijuta
Olejarczyk, Jennifer
Date Issued
December 2010
Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Citation
Potter, Mary C. et al. “Picture Detection in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation: Features or Identity?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36.6 (2010): 1486–1494. Web. 11 Apr. 2012. © 2010 American Physical Society
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
A pictured object can be readily detected in a rapid serial visual presentation sequence when the target is specified by a superordinate category name such as animal or vehicle. Are category features the initial basis for detection, with identification of the specific object occurring in a second stage (Evans & Treisman, 2005), or is identification of the object the basis for detection? When 2 targets in the same superordinate category are presented successively (lag 1), only the identification-first hypothesis predicts lag 1 sparing of the second target. The results of 2 experiments with novel pictures and a wide range of categories supported the identification-first hypothesis and a transient-attention model of lag 1 sparing and the attentional blink (Wyble, Bowman, & Potter, 2009)
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018730