Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Family, Ancestry and Self: What is the Moral Significance of Biological Ties

Family, Ancestry and Self: What is the Moral Significance of Biological Ties

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

HaslangerFASfman.pdf

Size

198.91 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

817cc027ce4bb09700a8539abb605807

Author(s)
Haslanger, Sally
Date Issued
January 2009
Journal
Adoption & Culture
Publisher
Alliance for the Study of Adoption and Culture
Citation
Haslanger, Sally. "Family, Ancestry and Self: What is the Moral Significance of Biological Ties?" Adoption & Culture (2009) 2.1.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
In a series of recent papers David Velleman has argued that it is morally wrong to bring a child into existence with the intention that the child will not have contact with one or both biological parents. (Velleman, 2005, 2008) Put another way, “other things being equal, children should be raised by their biological parents.” (Velleman, 2005 362fn 3) The primary targets of his argument are those who use anonymous donor egg or sperm to conceive a child. On his view, there is a significant value in being parented by and having ongoing contact with one’s biological relatives. “What is most troubling about gamete donation is that it purposely severs a connection of the sort that normally informs a person’s sense of identity, which is composed of elements that must bear emotional meaning, as only symbols and stories can.” (Velleman, 2005 363) Let’s be clear. He is not just interested in the possibility of having information about one’s biological progenitors, but actual knowledge by acquaintance. So the kind of profile that is typically made available by gamete donors or in closed adoptions is insufficient, and even information that is revealed through open records is not enough. A face-to-face relationship with both biological progenitors is, unless there are substantial overriding considerations, morally required.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/64650
DOI of Published Version
http://www.english.pitt.edu/adoption&culture/Volume_2.html
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.