Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Technoeconomic model of second-life batteries for utility-scale solar considering calendar and cycle aging

Technoeconomic model of second-life batteries for utility-scale solar considering calendar and cycle aging

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

1-s2.0-S0306261920306395-am.pdf

Description
Submitted version
Size

937.3 KB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

a3d1d4b122dec930cd5145432f48c979

sword-2021-12-15T16:10:50.original.xml (130 B)
Original SWORD entry document
Author(s)
Mathews, Ian
•
Xu, Bolun
•
He, Wei
•
Barreto, Vanessa
•
Buonassisi, Tonio
•
Peters, Ian Marius
Date Issued
May 2020
Journal
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Citation
Mathews, Ian, Xu, Bolun, He, Wei, Barreto, Vanessa, Buonassisi, Tonio et al. 2020. "Technoeconomic model of second-life batteries for utility-scale solar considering calendar and cycle aging." Applied Energy, 269.
Version
Original manuscript
Abstract
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd The rapid proliferation of electric vehicles is creating a fleet of millions of lithium-ion batteries that will be deemed unsuitable for the transportation industry once they reach 80% of their original capacity. The repurposing and deployment of these batteries as stationary energy storage provides an opportunity to reduce the cost of solar-plus-storage systems, if the economics can be proven. We present a techno-economic model of a solar-plus-second-life energy storage project in California, including a data-based model of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide battery degradation, to predict its capacity fade over time, and compare it to a project that uses a new lithium-ion battery. By setting certain control policy limits, to minimize cycle aging, we show that a system with state-of-charge limits in a 65–15% range, extends the project life to over 16 years, assuming a battery reaches its end-of-life at 60% of its original capacity. Under these conditions, a second-life project is more economically favorable than a project that uses a new battery and 85–20% state-of-charge limits, for second-life battery costs that are <80% of the new battery. The same system reaches break-even and profitability for second-life battery costs that are <60% of the new battery. Our model shows that using current benchmarked data for the capital and operations and maintenance costs of solar-plus-storage systems, and a semi-empirical data-based degradation model, it is possible for electric vehicle manufacturers to sell second-life batteries for <60% of their original price to developers of profitable solar-plus-storage projects.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
MIT Energy Initiative
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138486.2
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2020.115127
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.