Human-automation interaction for lunar landing aimpoint redesignation
Name
420292023-MIT.pdf
Description
Full printable version
Size
25.82 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
967dae2508d83db91b3d7a19f3a4d7b8
Author(s)
Needham, Jennifer M
Advisor(s)
Lauren J. Kessler and R. John Hansman.
Date Issued
2008
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Human-automation interactions are a critical area of research in systems with modem automation. The decision-making portion of tasks presents a special challenge for human-automation interactions because of the many factors that play a role in the decision-making process. This is prominent in human spaceflight, where the astronaut must continually interact with the vehicle systems. In future lunar landings, astronauts working in conjunction with automated systems will need to select a safe and achievable landing aimpoint. Ultimately, this decision could risk the safety of the astronauts and the success of their mission. Careful study is needed to ascertain the roles of both the human and the automation and how design can best support the decision making process. The task of landing on the moon was first achieved by the Apollo program in 1969, but technological advances will provide future landings with a greater variety and extensibility of mission goals. The modem task of selecting a landing aimpoint is known as landing point redesignation (LPR), and this work capitalizes on an existing LPR algorithm in order to explore the effects on landing point selection by altering the levels of automation. An experiment was designed to study the decision-making process with three different levels of automation. In addition, the effect of including a human-generated goal that was not captured by the automation was studied. The experimental results showed that the subjects generally used the same decision strategies across the different levels of automation, and that higher levels of automation were able to eliminate earlier parts of the decision strategy and allow the subjects to select a landing aimpoint more quickly. In scenarios with the additional human goal, subjects tended to sacrifice significant safety margins in order to achieve proximity to the point of interest. Higher levels of automation allowed them to maintain high levels of safety margins in addition to achieving their external goal. Thus, it is concluded that with a display design supporting human goals in a decision-making task, automated decision aids that make recommendations and assist communication of the automation's processes are highly beneficial.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 86-89).
Subjects
Aeronautics and Astronautics.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
Persistent DSpace Link
