Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing
Name
crispr.2020.29106.man.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
943.62 KB
Format
Unknown
Checksum (MD5)
c5d57250a5dfac9cf38fa5da9640a4d3
Author(s)
Church, George M
Hynes, Richard O
Kiani, Samira
Liu, David R.
Lunshof, Jeantine E.
Zhang, Feng
Date Issued
2020
Journal
The CRISPR Journal
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert Inc
Version
Final published version
Abstract
In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man
