Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity

Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

mnsc.2017.2798.pdf

Size

343.03 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

d14da34f5829a6e4d62834b1814833e9

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
sword-2019-02-01.original.zip (333.38 KB)
Author(s)
Catalini, Christian
Date Issued
July 2017
Journal
Management Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Citation
Catalini, Christian. “Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity.” Management Science 64, 9 (September 2018): 4348–4364 © 2017 The Author(s)
Version
Final published version
Abstract
I provide novel empirical evidence grounded in an original theoretical framework to explain why colocation matters for the rate, direction, and quality of scientific collaboration. To address endogeneity concerns due to selection into colocation and matching, I exploit the constraints imposed on the spatial allocation of labs on the Jussieu campus of Paris by the removal of asbestos from its buildings. Consistent with search costs constituting a major friction to collaboration, colocation increases the likelihood of joint research by 3.5 times, an effect that is mostly driven by lab pairs that face higher search costs ex ante. Furthermore, separation does not negatively affect collaboration between previously colocated labs. However, while colocated labs grow increasingly similar in topics and literature cited, separated ones embark on less correlated research trajectories. Research outcomes, instead, seem to be mostly influenced by how distance affects execution costs: after colocation, labs are more likely to pursue both lower-quality projects (a selection effect) and high-quality projects (an effort effect). Opposite effects on quality are observed after separation. Whereas search costs affect which scientists are likely to collaborate together, execution costs shape the quality of their output. Keywords: colocation; idea recombination; collaboration; search costs; microgeography; low-opportunity cost time
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120163
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2017.2798
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.