Numerical modeling study to compare the nutrient removal potential of different floating treatment island configurations in a stormwater pond
Name
Xavier.Janzen.Nepf.pdf
Size
6.91 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
1205f25beaad2472a78980f9cfbb22ed
Author(s)
Xavier, ManoelLucas Machado
Janzen, Johannes Gerson
Nepf, Heidi
Date Issued
February 2018
Journal
Ecological Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Citation
Xavier, Manoel Lucas Machado et al. "Numerical modeling study to compare the nutrient removal potential of different floating treatment island configurations in a stormwater pond." Ecological Engineering 111 (February 2018): 78-84 © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Constructed wetlands, which are commonly used in wastewater treatment, are difficult to use for stormwater treatment, because the water level variation in a stormwater pond makes it difficult for rooted vegetation to survive. As an alternative, vegetation can be grown on floating mats, called floating treatment islands (FTI), with roots extending downward into the water. Nutrient removal is achieved through uptake and trapping by the matrix of roots and bio-film. The overall treatment provided by a pond with FTIs depends on the fraction of flow exposed to the root zone. This study used numerical modeling to study the flow through the root zone, with the goal of determining which configuration of FTI achieved the greatest overall treatment. Six different configurations were considered, all with root zone volume equal to 11% of the pond volume. The permeability of the root zone was estimated using velocity measurements within real floating vegetation. A first-order removal rate within the root zone (k[subscript r]) was estimated from removal rates reported in the literature. Preliminary studies considered the similarity in flow and removal between systems of different physical scale. Geometric similarity of the root zone guaranteed flow similarity within the root zone. To achieve performance similarity (same mass reduction), systems need to have the same non-dimensional removal rate (k[subscript r]t[subscript n], with t[subscript n] the nominal residence time of the pond). The consideration of different FTI configurations showed that wakes generated by upstream FTIs lowered the mass removal of downstream FTIs, so that segmenting a single large FTI into multiple smaller FTIs in series did not improve overall nutrient removal. However, segmenting a single FTI into a pair of parallel FTIs did improve the nutrient removal, and this configuration provided the best pond-scale removal. Keywords: Floating treatment islands; Stormwater pond; Mass removal; Numerical modeling
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.022
