Prescribed fires, smoke exposure, and hospital utilization among heart failure patients
Name
12940_2023_Article_1032.pdf
Size
1.4 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
8013dbcfee7ec60f5aa76f53770e27cf
Author(s) • • • •
Raab, Henry
Moyer, Joshua
Afrin, Sadia
Garcia-Menendez, Fernando
Ward-Caviness, Cavin K.
Date Issued
December 13, 2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Citation
Environmental Health. 2023 Dec 13;22(1):86
Version
Final published version
Abstract
Background
Prescribed fires often have ecological benefits, but their environmental health risks have been infrequently studied. We investigated associations between residing near a prescribed fire, wildfire smoke exposure, and heart failure (HF) patients’ hospital utilization.
Methods
We used electronic health records from January 2014 to December 2016 in a North Carolina hospital-based cohort to determine HF diagnoses, primary residence, and hospital utilization. Using a cross-sectional study design, we associated the prescribed fire occurrences within 1, 2, and 5 km of the patients’ primary residence with the number of hospital visits and 7- and 30-day readmissions. To compare prescribed fire associations with those observed for wildfire smoke, we also associated zip code-level smoke density data designed to capture wildfire smoke emissions with hospital utilization amongst HF patients. Quasi-Poisson regression models were used for the number of hospital visits, while zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used for readmissions. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and included an offset for follow-up time. The results are the percent change and the 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
Associations between prescribed fire occurrences and hospital visits were generally null, with the few associations observed being with prescribed fires within 5 and 2 km of the primary residence in the negative direction but not the more restrictive 1 km radius. However, exposure to medium or heavy smoke (primarily from wildfires) at the zip code level was associated with both 7-day (8.5% increase; 95% CI = 1.5%, 16.0%) and 30-day readmissions (5.4%; 95% CI = 2.3%, 8.5%), and to a lesser degree, hospital visits (1.5%; 95% CI: 0.0%, 3.0%) matching previous studies.
Conclusions
Area-level smoke exposure driven by wildfires is positively associated with hospital utilization but not proximity to prescribed fires.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01032-4