“I am not a feminist, but. . .”: hegemony of a meritocratic ideology and the limits of critique among women in engineering
Name
8c26ac9ce622bd3328a30d2ae636b05284c0.pdf
Description
Accepted version
Size
205.93 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
dee626619162b0efa57b7782645669ad
Author(s)
Seron, Carroll
Silbey, Susan S
Cech, Erin
Rubineau, Brian
Date Issued
March 2018
Journal
Work and occupations
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Citation
Seron, Carroll, Susan Silbey, Erin Cech, and Brian Rubineau, "'I am not a feminist, but. . .': hegemony of a meritocratic ideology and the limits of critique among women in engineering." Work and occupations 45, 2 (March 2018): p. 131-67 doi 10.1177/0730888418759774 ©2018 Author(s)
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Engineering is often described as an enduring bastion of masculine culture where women experience marginality. Using diaries from undergraduate engineering students at four universities, the authors explore women’s interpretations of their status within the profession. The authors’ findings show that women recognize their marginality, providing clear and strong criticisms of their experiences. But these criticisms remain isolated and muted; they coalesce neither into broader organizational or institutional criticisms of engineering, nor into calls for change. Instead, their criticisms are interpreted through two values central to engineering culture: meritocracy and individualism. Despite their direct experiences with sexism, respondents typically embrace these values as ideological justifications of the existing distributions of status and reward in engineering and come to view engineering’s nonmeritocratic system as meritocratic. The unquestioned presumption of meritocracy and the invisibility of its muting effects on critiques resembles not hegemonic masculinity—for these women proudly celebrate their femininity—but a hegemony of meritocratic ideology. The authors conclude that engineering education successfully turns potential critics into agents of cultural reproduction. This article contributes to ongoing debates concerning diversity in STEM professions by showing how professional culture can contribute to more general patterns of token behavior—thus identifying mechanisms of cultural reproduction that thwart institutional change. ©2018
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Anthropology Program
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888418759774
