Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Coleridge’s Criticism of Life

Coleridge’s Criticism of Life

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

njackson-coleridgecriticismoflife.pdf

Description
Coleridge's Criticism of Life
Size

134.86 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

dd9c957eb8dc85995f84c4a245b7c731

Author(s)
Jackson, Noel B.
Date Issued
January 2011
Journal
Coleridge Bulletin
Publisher
Friends of Coleridge in Somerset
Citation
Jackson, Noel. "Coleridge’s Criticism of Life." Coleridge Bulletin, New Series 37, Summer 2011.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
MY PAPER IS ABOUT AN EXPERIENCE that Coleridge puts at the origin and at the heart of aesthetic response. This is a state for which Coleridge provides a phenomenological record of extraordinary precision and sensitivity; and Coleridge is as extraordinary—with Keats, perhaps, the best—phenomenologist of such experiences as we have. The experience features prominently in the poem “Dejection: an Ode,” and Coleridge elaborates on it in his first sustained piece of aesthetic criticism, the periodical “Essays on the Principles of Genial Criticism” of 1814—citing “Dejection” in that same text. These two very different texts are I’ll argue both primarily concerned with an experience of the beautiful, more particularly a manner of relation to the beautiful, that can be characterized as a state of “blank attachment.” This is a form of interest without interest, attachment without (as Coleridge says) the “intervenience of charm or emotion”—a “blank” and vacant form of perception in which one is conscious of attachment to the beautiful object without taking any pleasure in it whatsoever. I call this state of attachment “blank” in the sense that it is without character, and in a corollary sense in which its character is still to be filled in. The speaker in such moments accepts this open-ended arrangement, remaining committed to the object for as long as is required to see some change (whether in or outside of himself). His commitment to the object is without pleasure and without prospect, beyond this prospect of change.
Description
This is a slightly modified transcript of a talk delivered at the 2010 Coleridge Summer Conference.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Humanities. Literature Section
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77091
DOI of Published Version
http://www.friendsofcoleridge.com/coleridge-bulletin
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.