Diversity, Social Goods Provision, and Performance in the Firm
Name
EllisonS1011.pdf
Size
131.03 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
12f82ddd09c1a853436e1630906aac23
Author(s)
Ellison, Sara
Greenbaum, Jeffrey
Date Issued
August 31, 2010
Publisher
Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Series/Report no.
Working paper, massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics;10-11
Abstract
The last decade has seen a growing interest among economists on the effect of diversity on the provision of social goods and the stock of social capital. Indeed, in the workplace, cooperation, trust, and other social goods may be important elements of the smooth functioning of an office, but firm owners ultimately care about an office’s performance, as reflected in revenues, costs, and profits. We explore this next logical question: how does diversity affect ultimate performance? We have a unique data set from a firm which operates numerous small offices in the United States and abroad. They have provided us with eight years of individual-level employee survey data, which measure quantities such as level of cooperation, as well as office-level measures of diversity and performance over that period. We find some evidence that more homogeneous offices enjoy higher levels of social goods provision but that those offices do not perform any better and may actually perform worse. We speculate that one possible reason that the more homogeneous offices do not perform better despite higher levels of social goods provision is that they do not have as diverse a portfolio of skills, talents, and interests on which to draw.
Subjects
Diversity
Social Goods
Terms of Use
An error occurred on the license name.
Persistent DSpace Link
