Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Libraries
  3. MIT Theses
  4. Graduate Theses
  5. Why fight : examining self-interested versus communally-oriented motivations in Palestinian resistance and rebellion

Why fight : examining self-interested versus communally-oriented motivations in Palestinian resistance and rebellion

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

540710427-MIT.pdf

Description
Full printable version
Size

14.43 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

46f5005db5377d138df3840a7ee1aa6f

Author(s)
Argo, Nichole
Advisor(s)
Roger Petersen.
Alternative Title
Examining self-interested versus communally-oriented motivations in Palestinian resistance and rebellion
Date Issued
2009
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
Why do individuals participate in weak-against-strong resistance, terror or insurgency? Drawing on rational choice theory, many claim that individuals join insurgent organizations for self-interested reasons, seeking status, money, protection, or rewards in the afterlife. Another line of research, largely ethnographic and social network based, suggests that prospective fighters are driven by social identity-they join out of an allegiance to communal values, norms of reciprocity, and an orientation towards process rather than outcome. This project tested these two lines of argument against each other by directly linking values orientations in a refugee camp to professed willingness to participate in resistance or rebellion in two different contexts. Professed willingness to participate in resistance, and especially in violent rebellion, is positively correlated with communal orientation and negatively correlated with self-enhancement values. The strength of correlation grows-negatively for self-enhancement and positively for communal orientations-as anticipated sacrifice increases. Results are discussed.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.
"February 2009." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 32-36).
Subjects
Political Science.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Terms of Use
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53256
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.