Operational experience with the new CMS DAQ-Expert
Name
epjconf_chep2018_01015.pdf
Description
Published version
Size
1.01 MB
Format
Unknown
Checksum (MD5)
e3a40290095b51ff4728f8b518d8aaab
Author(s) • • •
Darlea, Georgiana-Lavinia
Demiragli, Zeynep
Gomez-Ceballos, Guillelmo
Paus, Christoph M. E.
Date Issued
September 2019
Journal
23rd International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2018)
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The data acquisition (DAQ) system of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) at CERN reads out the detector at the level-1 trigger accept rate of 100 kHz, assembles events with a bandwidth of 200 GB/s, provides these events to the high level-trigger running on a farm of about 30k cores and records the accepted events. Comprising custom-built and cutting edge commercial hardware and several 1000 instances of software applications, the DAQ system is complex in itself and failures cannot be completely excluded. Moreover, problems in the readout of the detectors,in the first level trigger system or in the high level trigger may provoke anomalous behaviour of the DAQ systemwhich sometimes cannot easily be differentiated from a problem in the DAQ system itself. In order to achieve high data taking efficiency with operators from the entire collaboration and without relying too heavily on the on-call experts, an expert system, the DAQ-Expert, has been developed that can pinpoint the source of most failures and give advice to the shift crew on how to recover in the quickest way. The DAQ-Expert constantly analyzes monitoring data from the DAQ system and the high level trigger by making use of logic modules written in Java that encapsulate the expert knowledge about potential operational problems. The results of the reasoning are presented to the operator in a web-based dashboard, may trigger sound alerts in the control room and are archived for post-mortem analysis - presented in a web-based timeline browser. We present the design of the DAQ-Expert and report on the operational experience since 2017, when it was first put into production.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1051/EPJCONF/201921401015