Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. CSAIL Digital Archive
  4. CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  5. Selecting Relevant Genes with a Spectral Approach

Selecting Relevant Genes with a Spectral Approach

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MIT-CSAIL-TR-2004-003.ps

Size

11.53 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

0d9d897791e138f4549e8cc9ba23f4b7

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

MIT-CSAIL-TR-2004-003.pdf

Size

614.42 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

8d094d9e60e87fa3b4db9e90ec07de83

Author(s)
Wolf, Lior
•
Shashua, Amnon
•
Mukherjee, Sayan
Date Issued
January 27, 2004
Series/Report no.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Abstract
Array technologies have made it possible to record simultaneouslythe expression pattern of thousands of genes. A fundamental problemin the analysis of gene expression data is the identification ofhighly relevant genes that either discriminate between phenotypiclabels or are important with respect to the cellular process studied inthe experiment: for example cell cycle or heat shock in yeast experiments,chemical or genetic perturbations of mammalian cell lines,and genes involved in class discovery for human tumors. In this paperwe focus on the task of unsupervised gene selection. The problemof selecting a small subset of genes is particularly challengingas the datasets involved are typically characterized by a very smallsample size — in the order of few tens of tissue samples — andby a very large feature space as the number of genes tend to bein the high thousands. We propose a model independent approachwhich scores candidate gene selections using spectral properties ofthe candidate affinity matrix. The algorithm is very straightforwardto implement yet contains a number of remarkable properties whichguarantee consistent sparse selections. To illustrate the value of ourapproach we applied our algorithm on five different datasets. Thefirst consists of time course data from four well studied Hematopoieticcell lines (HL-60, Jurkat, NB4, and U937). The other fourdatasets include three well studied treatment outcomes (large celllymphoma, childhood medulloblastomas, breast tumors) and oneunpublished dataset (lymph status). We compared our approachboth with other unsupervised methods (SOM,PCA,GS) and withsupervised methods (SNR,RMB,RFE). The results clearly showthat our approach considerably outperforms all the other unsupervisedapproaches in our study, is competitive with supervised methodsand in some case even outperforms supervised approaches.
Subjects
AI
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30444
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.