Reply to Reilly and Kean: Clarifications on word length and information content
Name
Piantadosi-2011-May-Reply to Reilly and Kean Clarifications.pdf
Size
434.28 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
6a4af506ecc22af4ee3dfc572c926e50
Author(s)
Piantadosi, Steven Thomas
Tily, Harry Joel
Gibson, Edward A.
Date Issued
May 2011
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
Citation
Piantadosi, S. T., H. Tily, and E. Gibson. “Reply to Reilly and Kean: Clarifications on word length and information content.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011): E109-E109. ©2011 by the National Academy of Sciences.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
First, we disagree with Reilly and Kean ( 1) that our results on word length ( 2) contradicted Zipf's principle of least effort. Our findings were in the same spirit, except that we measured effort in a more principled way than Zipf could have ( 2). Assigning word length by information content is least effort under an assumption of a superlinear relationship between effort and information content ( 3), and it is optimal under a desire to stay just under the channel capacity of linguistic systems ( 4).
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103550108
