A novel k-mer set memory (KSM) motif representation improves regulatory variant prediction
Name
EMB UNTIL Oct 13, 2018 Genome Res.-2018-Guo-891-900.pdf
Size
3.75 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
bbd9711e65d30421c60f1389a17a823f
Author(s) • • • •
Guo, Yuchun
Tian, Kevin J.
Zeng, Haoyang
Guo, Xiaoyun
Gifford, David K
Date Issued
April 2018
Journal
Genome Research
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Citation
Guo, Yuchun, Kevin Tian, Haoyang Zeng, Xiaoyun Guo, and David Kenneth Gifford. “A Novel k-Mer Set Memory (KSM) Motif Representation Improves Regulatory Variant Prediction.” Genome Research 28, no. 6 (April 13, 2018): 891–900.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
The representation and discovery of transcription factor (TF) sequence binding specificities is critical for understanding gene regulatory networks and interpreting the impact of disease-associated noncoding genetic variants. We present a novel TF binding motif representation, the k-mer set memory (KSM), which consists of a set of aligned k-mers that are overrepresented at TF binding sites, and a new method called KMAC for de novo discovery of KSMs. We find that KSMs more accurately predict in vivo binding sites than position weight matrix (PWM) models and other more complex motif models across a large set of ChIP-seq experiments. Furthermore, KSMs outperform PWMs and more complex motif models in predicting in vitro binding sites. KMAC also identifies correct motifs in more experiments than five state-of-the-art motif discovery methods. In addition, KSM-derived features outperform both PWM and deep learning model derived sequence features in predicting differential regulatory activities of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) alleles. Finally, we have applied KMAC to 1600 ENCODE TF ChIP-seq data sets and created a public resource of KSM and PWM motifs. We expect that the KSM representation and KMAC method will be valuable in characterizing TF binding specificities and in interpreting the effects of noncoding genetic variations.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computational and Systems Biology Program
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1101/GR.226852.117