LONG-TERM MONITORING OF THE DYNAMICS AND PARTICLE ACCELERATION OF KNOTS IN THE JET OF CENTAURUS A
Name
Goodger-2010-LONG-TERM MONITORING.pdf
Size
1.55 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f68f4991327a2d5d1c95d26663b00056
Author(s)
Goodger, J. L.
Hardcastle, M. J.
Croston, J. H.
Kraft, Ralph P.
Birkinshaw, M.
Evans, Daniel A.
Jordan, Andres
Nulsen, P. E. J.
Sivakoff, G. R.
Worrall, D. M.
Date Issued
January 2010
Journal
Astrophysical Journal
Publisher
Institute of Physics/American Astronomical Society
Citation
Goodger, J. L., M. J. Hardcastle, J. H. Croston, R. P. Kraft, M. Birkinshaw, D. A. Evans, A. Jordán, et al. “LONG-TERM MONITORING OF THE DYNAMICS AND PARTICLE ACCELERATION OF KNOTS IN THE JET OF CENTAURUS A.” The Astrophysical Journal 708, no. 1 (December 15, 2009): 675–697. © 2009 American Astronomical Society.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We present new and archival multi-frequency radio and X-ray data for Centaurus A obtained over almost 20 years at the Very Large Array and with Chandra, with which we measure the X-ray and radio spectral indices of jet knots, flux density variations in the jet knots, polarization variations, and proper motions. We compare the observed properties with current knot formation models and particle acceleration mechanisms. We rule out impulsive particle acceleration as a formation mechanism for all of the knots as we detect the same population of knots in all of the observations, and we find no evidence of extreme variability in the X-ray knots. We find that the most likely mechanism for all the stationary knots is a collision resulting in a local shock followed by a steady state of prolonged, stable particle acceleration, and X-ray synchrotron emission. In this scenario, the X-ray-only knots have radio counterparts that are too faint to be detected, while the radio-only knots are due to weak shocks where no particles are accelerated to X-ray emitting energies. Although the base knots are prime candidates for reconfinement shocks, the presence of a moving knot in this vicinity and the fact that there are two base knots are hard to explain in this model. We detect apparent motion in three knots; however, their velocities and locations provide no conclusive evidence for or against a faster moving "spine" within the jet. The radio-only knots, both stationary and moving, may be due to compression of the fluid.
MIT Department
MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/675
