Techno-economic optimization of a scaled-up solar concentrator combined with CSPonD thermal energy storage
Name
Techno-economic_optimization_of_a_scaled-up_solar_.pdf
Size
706.13 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
06374ee94f25719c3ddfcd9c26864efd
Author(s) • • • • • •
Musi, Richard
Grange, Benjamin
Diago, Miguel
Topel, Monika
Armstrong, Peter
Calvet, Nicolas
Slocum, Alexander H
Date Issued
June 2017
Journal
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Citation
Musi, Richard, et al. "Techno-Economic Optimization of a Scaled-up Solar Concentrator Combined with CSPonD Thermal Energy Storage." AIP Conference Proceedings,1850.1 (2017): p. 110010.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
A molten salt direct absorption receiver, CSPonD, used to simultaneously collect and store thermal energy is being tested by Masdar Institute and MIT in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Whilst a research-scale prototype has been combined with a beam-down tower in Abu Dhabi, the original design coupled the receiver with a hillside heliostat field. With respect to a conventional power-tower setup, a hillside solar field presents the advantages of eliminating tower costs, heat tracing equipment, and high-pressure pumps. This analysis considers the industrial viability of the CSPonD concept by modeling
a 10 MWe up-scaled version of a molten salt direct absorption receiver combined with a hillside heliostat field. Five different slope angles are initially simulated to determine the optimum choice using a combination of lowest LCOE and highest IRR, and sensitivity analyses are carried out based on thermal energy storage duration, power output, and feed-in tariff price. Finally, multi-objective optimization is undertaken to determine a Pareto front representing optimum cases. The study indicates that a 40° slope and a combination of 14 h thermal energy storage with a 40-50 MW[subscript e] power output provide the best techno-economic results. By selecting one simulated result and using a feed-in tariff of 0.25 $/kWh, a competitive IRR of 15.01 % can be achieved.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984484