Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Constraints in modeling the quasielastic response in inclusive lepton-nucleus scattering

Constraints in modeling the quasielastic response in inclusive lepton-nucleus scattering

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

PhysRevC.101.015503.pdf

Size

831.72 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

30574d7cbf04fc8dd459bb6d851c689c

Download all files submitted through automated deposit
PhysRevC.101.015503-mets.zip (578.52 KB)
Author(s)
González-Jiménez, R.
•
Barbaro, M. B.
•
Caballero, J. A.
•
Donnelly, T William
•
Jachowicz, N.
•
Megias, G. D.
•
Niewczas, K.
•
Nikolakopoulos, A.
•
Udías, J. M.
Date Issued
January 2020
Journal
Physical Review C
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Citation
González-Jiménez, R. et al. "Constraints in modeling the quasielastic response in inclusive lepton-nucleus scattering." Physical Review C, 101, 1 (January 2020): 015503. © 2020 American Physical Society
Version
Final published version
Abstract
We show that the quasielastic (QE) response calculated with the superscaling approach (SuSAv2) model, that relies on the scaling phenomenon observed in the analysis of (e,e^{′}) data and on the relativistic mean-field theory, is very similar to that from a relativistic distorted-wave impulse approximation model when only the real part of the optical potentials is employed. The coincidence between the results from these two completely independent approaches, which satisfactorily agree with the inclusive data, reinforces the reliability of the quasielastic predictions stemming from both models and sets constraints for the QE response. We also study the low-energy and momentum-transfer region of the inclusive response by confronting the results of the relativistic mean-field model with those of the Hartree-Fock continuum random-phase approximation model, which accounts for nuclear long-range correlations. Finally, we present a comparison of our results with the recent Jefferson Laboratory (JLab) (e,e^{′}) data for argon, titanium, and carbon, finding good agreement with the three data sets.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Theoretical Physics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125810
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.015503
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.