No evidence of theory of mind reasoning in the human language network
Name
2022.07.18.500516v1.full.pdf
Description
Submitted version
Size
3.14 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
ec572cb96690503864a6dfe2950ca04d
Author(s)
Shain, Cory
Paunov, Alexander
Chen, Xuanyi
Lipkin, Benjamin
Fedorenko, Evelina
Date Issued
December 28, 2022
Journal
Cerebral Cortex
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation
Shain, Cory, Paunov, Alexander, Chen, Xuanyi, Lipkin, Benjamin and Fedorenko, Evelina. 2022. "No evidence of theory of mind reasoning in the human language network." Cerebral Cortex.
Version
Original manuscript
Abstract
Abstract
Language comprehension and the ability to infer others’ thoughts (theory of mind [ToM]) are interrelated during development and language use. However, neural evidence that bears on the relationship between language and ToM mechanisms is mixed. Although robust dissociations have been reported in brain disorders, brain activations for contrasts that target language and ToM bear similarities, and some have reported overlap. We take another look at the language-ToM relationship by evaluating the response of the language network, as measured with fMRI, to verbal and nonverbal ToM across 151 participants. Individual-participant analyses reveal that all core language regions respond more strongly when participants read vignettes about false beliefs compared to the control vignettes. However, we show that these differences are largely due to linguistic confounds, and no such effects appear in a nonverbal ToM task. These results argue against cognitive and neural overlap between language processing and ToM. In exploratory analyses, we find responses to social processing in the “periphery” of the language network—right-hemisphere homotopes of core language areas and areas in bilateral angular gyri—but these responses are not selectively ToM-related and may reflect general visual semantic processing.
Language comprehension and the ability to infer others’ thoughts (theory of mind [ToM]) are interrelated during development and language use. However, neural evidence that bears on the relationship between language and ToM mechanisms is mixed. Although robust dissociations have been reported in brain disorders, brain activations for contrasts that target language and ToM bear similarities, and some have reported overlap. We take another look at the language-ToM relationship by evaluating the response of the language network, as measured with fMRI, to verbal and nonverbal ToM across 151 participants. Individual-participant analyses reveal that all core language regions respond more strongly when participants read vignettes about false beliefs compared to the control vignettes. However, we show that these differences are largely due to linguistic confounds, and no such effects appear in a nonverbal ToM task. These results argue against cognitive and neural overlap between language processing and ToM. In exploratory analyses, we find responses to social processing in the “periphery” of the language network—right-hemisphere homotopes of core language areas and areas in bilateral angular gyri—but these responses are not selectively ToM-related and may reflect general visual semantic processing.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac505
