Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management
Name
Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management.pdf
Size
2.47 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
f19d464dcc95701ba0c9af6139b3ffdb
Author(s)
Gain, Animesh K.
Hossain, Sarwar
Benson, David
Di Baldassarre, Giuliano
Giupponi, Carlo
Huq, Nazmul
Date Issued
June 18, 2020
Journal
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Gain, A. K., Hossain, S., Benson, D., Di Baldassarre, G., Giupponi, C., & Huq, N. (2020). Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(2), 109–124.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
In the era of the Anthropocene, understanding the dynamic interactions between humans andwater is crucial for supporting both human well-being and the sustainable management ofresources. The current water management challenges are inherently unpredictable and difficultto control. Social-ecological systems (SESs) approaches explicitly recognize the connections andfeedbacks between human and natural systems. For addressing the complex challenges of theAnthropocene, consideration of SES attributes such as causality (or interdependence), feedback,non-linearity, heterogeneity, and cross-scale dynamics is important. In addition, innovative quali-tative and quantitative methods such as Bayesian networks, agent-based modelling, systemdynamics, network analysis, multicriteria analysis, integrated assessment and role-play gameshave recently been used in SES research. The overall goal of this review is to gauge the extentto which SES attributes and methods are considered within the current interdisciplinary waterparadigm. The paper therefore develops the normative theoretical characteristics of SES in termsof its key attributes (i.e. causality, feedback, heterogeneity, nonlinearity, and cross-scale dynamics)incorporated in the water paradigm approaches. The paper then compares the methods appliedin the interdisciplinary water paradigm and examines how they can complement each other.Finally, the paper reflects back on the usefulness of SES attributes and methods for assessing theinterdisciplinary water paradigm and makes recommendations for future research.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1780647
