Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  3. Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  4. AI Technical Reports (1964 - 2004)
  5. A Study of Qualitative and Geometric Knowledge in Reasoning about Motion

A Study of Qualitative and Geometric Knowledge in Reasoning about Motion

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-615.pdf

Size

5.8 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

fc8e9b6457e7cad65ff49e1ab5839e89

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

AITR-615.ps

Size

15.84 MB

Format

PostScript

Checksum (MD5)

1f0d88dc69ccc53049423b69ca346712

Author(s)
Forbus, Kenneth D.
Date Issued
February 1, 1981
Series/Report no.
AITR-615
Abstract
Reasoning about motion is an important part of our commonsense knowledge, involving fluent spatial reasoning. This work studies the qualitative and geometric knowledge required to reason in a world that consists of balls moving through space constrained by collisions with surfaces, including dissipative forces and multiple moving objects. An analog geometry representation serves the program as a diagram, allowing many spatial questions to be answered by numeric calculation. It also provides the foundation for the construction and use of place vocabulary, the symbolic descriptions of space required to do qualitative reasoning about motion in the domain. The actual motion of a ball is described as a network consisting of descriptions of qualitatively distinct types of motion. Implementing the elements of these networks in a constraint language allows the same elements to be used for both analysis and simulation of motion. A qualitative description of the actual motion is also used to check the consistency of assumptions about motion. A process of qualitative simulation is used to describe the kinds of motion possible from some state. The ambiguity inherent in such a description can be reduced by assumptions about physical properties of the ball or assumptions about its motion. Each assumption directly rules out some kinds of motion, but other knowledge is required to determine the indirect consequences of making these assumptions. Some of this knowledge is domain dependent and relies heavily on spatial descriptions.
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6863
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.