A School-Based Evaluation of the FRIENDS Resilience Programs: Implications for Mental Health Concerns in Rural Students
Name
12310_2024_9682_ReferencePDF.pdf
Size
802.3 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
e13fa6c5edfd5f13da6c6612e56c6b4c
Author(s)
Schwartz-Mette, Rebecca A.
Lawrence, Hannah R.
Fearey, Eliot
Shankman, Jessica
Nichols, Janet
Walters, Joy
Perello, Elena
Smith, Susan
Date Issued
June 29, 2024
Journal
School Mental Health
Publisher
Springer US
Citation
Schwartz-Mette, R.A., Lawrence, H.R., Fearey, E. et al. A School-Based Evaluation of the FRIENDS Resilience Programs: Implications for Mental Health Concerns in Rural Students. School Mental Health 16, 1156–1170 (2024).
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
The FRIENDS Resilience programs provide cognitive-behavioral skills across the developmental spectrum and can be applied as a universal or selective prevention program. In the current study, we assessed whether, relative to the schools’ existing counseling curriculum (“guidance”), FRIENDS improved social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence in a sample of 650 students in kindergarten, 2nd, 5th, and 7th grade in a rural community in the northeastern United States. Student, parent, and teacher reports were obtained pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 4 months later. Analyses examined FRIENDS as a universal prevention program in the general school population and as a selective intervention for at-risk students (those with elevated existing symptoms). Teachers reported improvements in social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence, and parents reported improved problem behaviors immediately post-intervention for all students receiving FRIENDS and guidance. However, at-risk students who received FRIENDS experienced significantly greater improvements in teacher-reported problem behaviors compared to those who received guidance. When assessing changes over time once all students had received FRIENDS, teacher-rated social skills and academic competence improved, and student- and parent-rated problem behaviors decreased from pre- to post-FRIENDS and 4-month follow-up. Effects were consistent for the overall sample and at-risk students, with stronger effects for those at-risk. These small yet significant effects of FRIENDS as universal prevention may be more limited relative to usual guidance curriculum, but preventative effects may be enhanced for those students in more immediate need of support. Directions for future evaluation of FRIENDS are discussed.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Division of Student Life
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09682-6
