Estimating Marginal Returns to Medical Care: Evidence from At-Risk Newborns
Name
Almond-2010-ESTIMATING MARGINAL RETURNS TO MEDICAL CARE EVIDENCE FROM AT-RISK NEWBORNS.pdf
Size
507.3 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
89d8458332096039d7fd7b84038c3b67
Author(s) • • •
Almond, Douglas
Doyle, Joseph J.
Kowalski, Amanda E.
Williams, Heidi L.
Date Issued
April 2010
Journal
Quarterly journal of economics
Publisher
MIT Press
Citation
Almond, Douglas, Doyle, Joseph J., Kowalski, Amanda E. and Williams, Heidi (2010). Estimating marginal returns to medical care: evidence from at-risk newborns. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125: 591-634.
Version
Final published version
Abstract
A key policy question is whether the benefits of additional medical expenditures exceed their costs. We propose a new approach for estimating marginal returns to medical spending based on variation in medical inputs generated by diagnostic thresholds. Specifically, we combine regression discontinuity estimates that compare health outcomes and medical treatment provision for newborns on either side of the very low birth weight threshold at 1,500 grams. First, using data on the census of U.S. births in available years from 1983 to 2002, we find that newborns with birth weights just below 1,500 grams have lower one-year mortality rates than do newborns with birth weights just above this cutoff, even though mortality risk tends to decrease with birth weight. One-year mortality falls by approximately one percentage point as birth weight crosses 1,500 grams from above, which is large relative to mean infant mortality of 5.5% just above 1,500 grams. Second, using hospital discharge records for births in five states in available years from 1991 to 2006, we find that newborns with birth weights just below 1,500 grams have discontinuously higher charges and frequencies of specific medical inputs. Hospital costs increase by approximately $4,000 as birth weight crosses 1,500 grams from above, relative to mean hospital costs of $40,000 just above 1,500 grams. Under an assumption that observed medical spending fully captures the impact of the "very low birth weight" designation on mortality, our estimates suggest that the cost of saving a statistical life of a newborn with birth weight near 1,500 grams is on the order of $550,000 in 2006 dollars.
MIT Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Persistent DSpace Link
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.591