Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers

Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Fine_Dynamic business.pdf

Size

2.92 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

597bdaa8a148b0663a3c9a7df3d613b2

Author(s)
Li, Hongmin
•
Zhang, Hao
•
Fine, Charles H.
Date Issued
April 2013
Journal
Operations Research
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Citation
Li, Hongmin, Hao Zhang, and Charles H. Fine. “Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers.” Operations Research 61, no. 2 (April 2013): 280–297.
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
This paper studies a repeated game between a manufacturer and two competing suppliers with imperfect monitoring. We present a principal-agent model for managing long-term supplier relationships using a unique form of measurement and incentive scheme. We measure a supplier's overall performance with a rating equivalent to its continuation utility (the expected total discounted utility of its future payoffs), and incentivize supplier effort with larger allocations of future business. We obtain the vector of the two suppliers' ratings as the state of a Markov decision process, and we solve an infinite horizon contracting problem in which the manufacturer allocates business volume between the two suppliers and updates their ratings dynamically based on their current ratings and the current performance outcome. Our contributions are both theoretical and managerial: we propose a repeated principal-agent model with a novel incentive scheme to tackle a common, but challenging, incentive problem in a multiperiod supply chain setting. Assuming binary effort choices and performance outcomes by the suppliers, we characterize the structure of the optimal contract through a novel fixed-point analysis. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for the emergence of “business-as-usual” (low effort) trapping states and tournament competition (high effort) recurrent states as the long-run incentive drivers for motivating critical suppliers.
MIT Department
Sloan School of Management
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/87687
DOI of Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1155
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.